1987 Ford Sierra vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Sierra would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (152 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1987 Ford Sierra. (113 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Sierra weights approximately 115 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Equator (232 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Sierra. (180 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Equator will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Sierra | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Sierra | Equator |
Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2294 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |