1987 Ford Taurus vs. 2006 Mazda DrifterX
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Taurus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Taurus would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1987 Ford Taurus. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda DrifterX should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Taurus.
Because 2006 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Taurus. (176 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Taurus.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Taurus | 2006 Mazda DrifterX | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Taurus | DrifterX |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2511 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 257 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |