1987 Ford Tempo vs. 1960 NSU Sport
To start off, 1987 Ford Tempo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 NSU Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 NSU Sport would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1960 NSU Sport. (30 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1960 NSU Sport. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Tempo weights approximately 589 kg more than 1960 NSU Sport. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 NSU Sport is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 NSU Sport. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Ford Tempo | 1960 NSU Sport | |
| Make | Ford | NSU |
| Model | Tempo | Sport |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 583 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 516 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1250 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2010 mm |
