1987 Ford Tempo vs. 1973 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 1987 Ford Tempo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1987 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 1973 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Tempo | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 37 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |