1987 Ford Tempo vs. 1989 Rover 216
To start off, 1989 Rover 216 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Rover 216 (114 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1987 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Rover 216 should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Tempo weights approximately 25 kg more than 1989 Rover 216.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Rover 216. (141 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 1987 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Rover 216.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 1989 Rover 216 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Tempo | 216 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2550 mm |