1987 Ford Tempo vs. 1998 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1998 Mazda Midge is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Midge. (67 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Tempo weights approximately 139 kg more than 1998 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1987 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 1998 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | Midge |
Year Released | 1987 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |