1987 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Marcos TSO
To start off, 2004 Marcos TSO is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Marcos TSO is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Marcos TSO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Marcos TSO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Ford Tempo | 2004 Marcos TSO | |
| Make | Ford | Marcos |
| Model | Tempo | TSO |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 5667 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
