1987 Ford Tempo vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (98 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1987 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Tempo weights approximately 50 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1987 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Tempo | Clio |
Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2590 mm |