1987 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Kia Cerato
To start off, 2005 Kia Cerato is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Kia Cerato (101 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1987 Ford Tempo. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Kia Cerato should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Cerato weights approximately 90 kg more than 1987 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Cerato. (144 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1987 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Cerato.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 2005 Kia Cerato | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Tempo | Cerato |
Year Released | 1987 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 101 HP |
Torque | 170 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |