1987 Ford Tempo vs. 2005 Kia K2700

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 425 kg more than 1987 Ford Tempo.

Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Kia K2700 (175 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2005 Kia K2700 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Tempo.

Compare all specifications: