1987 Ford Tempo vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1987 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Tempo weights approximately 40 kg more than 2006 Suzuki Reno.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Tempo | Reno |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |