1987 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2011 Fiat Croma is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Fiat Croma (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1987 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Tempo weights approximately 165 kg more than 2011 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 2011 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Ford | Fiat |
Model | Tempo | Croma |
Year Released | 1987 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |