1987 Ford Tempo vs. 2011 Mazda 5
To start off, 2011 Mazda 5 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1987 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda 5 weights approximately 445 kg more than 1987 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 5 (221 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Ford Tempo | 2011 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Tempo | 5 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2751 mm |