1987 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1980 Audi 4000
To start off, 1987 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Ford Thunderbird (193 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1980 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1980 Audi 4000.
Because 1980 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Audi 4000 (137 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Ford Thunderbird. (91 Nm). This means 1980 Audi 4000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Ford Thunderbird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Ford Thunderbird | 1980 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Thunderbird | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2301 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 91 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.4 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Top Speed | 222 km/hour | 168 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2550 mm |
