1987 Holden Astra vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (100 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1987 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Astra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1987 Holden Astra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 3 (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Holden Astra.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Holden Astra | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | Astra | 3 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2650 mm |