1987 Holden Astra vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8

To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Astra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Astra would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Holden Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1987 Holden Astra. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Astra.

Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Holden Astra. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Holden Astra. 2008 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1987 Holden Astra has manual transmission. 1987 Holden Astra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: