1987 Holden Camira vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 1987 Holden Camira is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1987 Holden Camira. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Camira.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Holden Camira | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Camira | 16 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1958 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 238 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |