1987 Holden Camira vs. 1968 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1987 Holden Camira is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 1,857 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Holden Camira (111 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1968 Toyota Corona. (100 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 1968 Toyota Corona.
Because 1968 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Holden Camira | 1968 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Camira | Corona |
Year Released | 1987 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1857 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2590 mm |