1987 Holden Camira vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Camira would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Holden Camira (111 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Holden Camira should accelerate faster than 1996 Mahindra Armada.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Holden Camira. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Holden Camira | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Holden | Mahindra |
| Model | Camira | Armada |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4310 mm |
