1987 Holden Camira vs. 2010 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Camira would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1987 Holden Camira. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Camira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 553 kg more than 1987 Holden Camira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Holden Camira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Mustang (440 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Holden Camira. (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Holden Camira.

Compare all specifications: