1987 Holden Camira vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1987 Holden Camira. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Holden Camira | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | Camira | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 122 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2436 mm |
