1987 Holden Camira vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Camira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Camira would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Holden Camira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1987 Holden Camira. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Camira.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Holden Camira (176 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1987 Holden Camira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Holden Camira | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | Camira | Matrix |
Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2601 mm |