1987 Holden Commodore vs. 2012 Honda Accord

To start off, 2012 Honda Accord is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 2,962 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Holden Commodore (153 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Honda Accord. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Accord.

Because 1987 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Accord (350 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Holden Commodore. (247 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Holden Commodore. 2012 Honda Accord has automatic transmission and 1987 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 1987 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda Accord will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: