1987 Honda Accord vs. 2006 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2006 Nissan 1400 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Honda Accord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Honda Accord would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Honda Accord is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Nissan 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Honda Accord | 2006 Nissan 1400 | |
Make | Honda | Nissan |
Model | Accord | 1400 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1397 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2310 mm |