1987 Jeep Cherokee vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Jeep Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Jeep Cherokee would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1987 Jeep Cherokee. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1987 Jeep Cherokee.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Jeep Cherokee. (180 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Jeep Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Jeep Cherokee | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Jeep | Citroen |
Model | Cherokee | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2068 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |