1987 Lada Samara vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1987 Lada Samara is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lada Samara | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lada | Triumph |
Model | Samara | 2000 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |