1987 Lada Samara vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 1993 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Renault Clio (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Lada Samara weights approximately 25 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lada Samara | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lada | Renault |
Model | Samara | Clio |
Year Released | 1987 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 75.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.6 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1400 mm |