1987 Lada Samara vs. 2004 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 2004 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 467 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lada Samara | 2004 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | Samara | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 61 L |