1987 Lada Samara vs. 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca
To start off, 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,999 cc, 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca (250 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca weights approximately 708 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lada Samara | 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca | |
Make | Lada | Subaru |
Model | Samara | B9 Tribeca |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 250 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.6 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1633 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 64 L |