1987 Lada Samara vs. 2008 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2008 Holden Commodore is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara.
Because 2008 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 144 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Lada Samara. (96 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lada Samara | 2008 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Lada | Holden |
Model | Samara | Commodore |
Year Released | 1987 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1288 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 96 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |