1987 Lada Samara vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lada Samara | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Lada | Citroen |
Model | Samara | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 60.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |