1987 Lada Samara vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Lada Samara. (119 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Lada Samara | 2009 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Lada | Holden |
| Model | Samara | UTE |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1458 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 261 HP |
| Torque | 119 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
