1987 Lada Samara vs. 2009 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,306 cc, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 500 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Lada Samara | 2009 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Lada | Mazda |
| Model | Samara | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 1306 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 228 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.6 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 140 km/hour | 235 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 17 seconds | 6.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 61 L |
