1987 Lada Samara vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 303 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lada Samara | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Lada | Kia |
Model | Samara | Forte |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1228 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4529 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1775 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.6 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 52 L |