1987 Lada Samara vs. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 809 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox has automatic transmission and 1987 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1987 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Chevrolet Equinox will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Lada Samara | 2011 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | Lada | Chevrolet |
| Model | Samara | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1734 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2858 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.6 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 71 L |
