1987 Lada Samara vs. 2011 Holden UTE
To start off, 2011 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 305 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara.
Because 2011 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lada Samara | 2011 Holden UTE | |
Make | Lada | Holden |
Model | Samara | UTE |
Year Released | 1987 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1100 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 357 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |