1987 Lada Samara vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Toyota Matrix has automatic transmission and 1987 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1987 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Toyota Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Lada Samara | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Lada | Toyota |
| Model | Samara | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |
