1987 Lada Samara vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi TT weights approximately 600 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Lada Samara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (465 Nm @ 1650 RPM) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Lada Samara. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Lada Samara.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Lada Samara | 2012 Audi TT | |
| Make | Lada | Audi |
| Model | Samara | TT |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1288 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 360 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 96 Nm | 465 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1650 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4199 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1349 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 60 L |
