1987 Lada Samara vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 892 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1987 Lada Samara has manual transmission. 1987 Lada Samara will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Lada Samara | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Lada | Cadillac |
| Model | Samara | XTS |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.6 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 11.5 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1817 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5131 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1852 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2831 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 72 L |
