1987 Lada Samara vs. 2013 Nissan Versa
To start off, 2013 Nissan Versa is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Lada Samara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Lada Samara would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Versa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Versa (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1987 Lada Samara. (52 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Versa should accelerate faster than 1987 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Versa weights approximately 142 kg more than 1987 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Lada Samara | 2013 Nissan Versa | |
| Make | Lada | Nissan |
| Model | Samara | Versa |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1100 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 52 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 60.6 mm | 83 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1067 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4455 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.6 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.9 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 41 L |
