1987 Lancia Delta vs. 1979 Mazda 121
To start off, 1987 Lancia Delta is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Mazda 121 (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1987 Lancia Delta. (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Mazda 121 should accelerate faster than 1987 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mazda 121 weights approximately 199 kg more than 1987 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Lancia Delta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda 121 (160 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Lancia Delta. (105 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1979 Mazda 121 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lancia Delta | 1979 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Lancia | Mazda |
Model | Delta | 121 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1301 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 935 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2520 mm |