1987 Lancia Prisma vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1987 Lancia Prisma is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1987 Lancia Prisma. (76 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1987 Lancia Prisma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1987 Lancia Prisma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Lancia Prisma. (105 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Lancia Prisma.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Lancia Prisma | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lancia | Triumph |
Model | Prisma | 2000 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1301 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 64 L |