1987 Mazda 323 vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 48 more horse power than 1987 Mazda 323. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 581 kg more than 1987 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mazda 323. (101 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mazda 323 | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 323 | C30 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1324 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1783 mm |