1987 Mazda 626 vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1987 Mazda 626 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1947 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mazda 626 | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 626 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2850 mm |