1987 Mazda 626 vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1987 Mazda 626 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 4,474 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mazda 626 | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 626 | Valiant |
Year Released | 1987 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 4474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |