1987 Mazda 626 vs. 1992 Volvo 960

To start off, 1992 Volvo 960 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1987 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 960 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1987 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1987 Mazda 626 1992 Volvo 960
Make Mazda Volvo
Model 626 960
Year Released 1987 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1789 cc 1986 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 187 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1120 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4520 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2780 mm