1987 Mazda 626 vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2002 Pagani Zonda is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 7,010 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (542 HP) has 396 more horse power than 1987 Mazda 626. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Mazda 626 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2002 Pagani Zonda.
Because 2002 Pagani Zonda is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Pagani Zonda. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mazda 626 | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
Make | Mazda | Pagani |
Model | 626 | Zonda |
Year Released | 1987 | 2002 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 542 HP |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 335 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2055 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1151 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |