1987 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1987 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda 626.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mazda 626. (134 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mazda 626 | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 626 | E-350 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1789 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 134 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2619 mm |