1987 Mazda 929 vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Mazda 929 (114 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Mazda 929 weights approximately 570 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Mazda 929 (184 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1987 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mazda 929 | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 929 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1987 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2183 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 184 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 1810 mm |