1987 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1987 Mazda RX-7. (197 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mazda RX-7. (271 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mazda RX-7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Mazda RX-7 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | RX-7 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2616 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1442 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2880 mm |
